head-to-head

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
Vendoranthropic~deepseek
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score100.0-
Input Price$2.00/M$0.00/M
Output Price$10.00/M$2.40/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output128,000943,718
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index95.1-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek Flash Latest costs $0.60 and Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) costs $4.50, so DeepSeek Flash Latest is about 7.5 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) scores higher on 16 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), DeepSeek Flash Latest on 4 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling and others).

Pick Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) if you need the stronger all-round task scores; pick DeepSeek Flash Latest if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskAnthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
SQL Generation 144 133
Code Review 150 132
Code Completion 119 131
Code Refactoring 151 136
Bug Fixing 154 136
Unit Test Generation 135 124
Code Documentation 138 131
Regex Writing 127 119
CI/CD Pipelines 131 120
Frontend Component Design 133 122
Data Analysis 138 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 133
ETL Scripting 141 128
JSON Extraction 121 131
Bulk Data Labeling 118 129
OCR / Document Parsing 135 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 135 131
Long-Document Summarization 152 137
Short-Form Summarization 118 123
Blog Post Writing 132 121

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.