head-to-head
DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-27.
| DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ~deepseek | meta |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.04/M | $0.10/M |
| Output Price | $0.29/M | $0.20/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 384,000 | 943,718 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | ✓ |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek Flash Latest costs $0.11 and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.15, so DeepSeek Flash Latest is about 1.4 times cheaper for the same work.
Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.
Only Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor offers audio input and video input.
Pick DeepSeek Flash Latest if you need lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor if you need audio input or video input.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Related comparisons
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Space Bunny Alpha vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
Space Bunny Alpha vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Cohere: Command A+ vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
Cohere: Command A+ vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor