head-to-head

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash
Vendordeepseekz-ai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score66.370.6
Input Price$0.11/M$0.15/M
Output Price$0.34/M$0.50/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output131,072943,717
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index65.169.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) costs $0.20 and GLM 5.3 Flash costs $0.28, so DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is about 1.4 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.

Only GLM 5.3 Flash offers video input.

On our blended benchmark score GLM 5.3 Flash leads 70.6 to 66.3.

Across the 18 tasks where they differ, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) scores higher on 1 (Bulk Data Labeling), GLM 5.3 Flash on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others).

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) was released in September 2026 and GLM 5.3 Flash in August 2026.

Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost; pick GLM 5.3 Flash if you need video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash
SQL Generation 141 142
Code Review 144 145
Code Refactoring 146 147
Bug Fixing 148 149
Unit Test Generation 131 132
Code Documentation 137 138
Regex Writing 126 126
CI/CD Pipelines 127 128
Frontend Component Design 129 130
Data Analysis 133 134
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 136
ETL Scripting 137 137
Bulk Data Labeling 129 129
OCR / Document Parsing 134 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 134
Long-Document Summarization 148 149
Short-Form Summarization 127 127
Blog Post Writing 129 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.