head-to-head
Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs xAI: Grok 4.3
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-23.
| Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | xAI: Grok 4.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | x-ai | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 57.7 |
| Input Price | $0.25/M | $1.25/M |
| Output Price | $1.50/M | $2.50/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 65,536 | - |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 62.0 |
| ai_index_agentic | - | 39.8 |
| ai_index_coding | - | 69.7 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | xAI: Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 133 | 158 |
| Code Review | 132 | 155 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 120 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 155 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 164 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 144 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 139 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 130 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 136 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 138 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 153 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 133 | 147 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 145 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 134 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 124 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 141 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 141 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 137 | 152 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 120 |
| Blog Post Writing | 121 | 134 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs xAI: Grok 4.3
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs xAI: Grok 4.3
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs xAI: Grok 4.3
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs xAI: Grok 4.3