head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-27.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Vendorgoogledeepseek
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score69.057.7
Input Price$0.38/M$0.22/M
Output Price$1.88/M$0.65/M
Context Window1,048,5761,048,576
Max Output65,536262,144
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index67.557.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp costs $0.38 and Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) costs $0.84, so DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is about 2.2 times cheaper for the same work.

Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) offers audio input and video input.

On our blended benchmark score Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) leads 69.0 to 57.7.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) scores higher on 17 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp on 3 (Code Completion, JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling).

Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) was released in September 2026 and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp in August 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) if you need audio input, video input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
SQL Generation 141 140
Code Review 144 142
Code Completion 132 133
Code Refactoring 146 145
Bug Fixing 148 146
Unit Test Generation 132 130
Code Documentation 137 137
Regex Writing 126 125
CI/CD Pipelines 128 126
Frontend Component Design 130 128
Data Analysis 134 132
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 136
ETL Scripting 137 136
JSON Extraction 131 131
Bulk Data Labeling 129 129
OCR / Document Parsing 134 133
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 133
Long-Document Summarization 148 147
Short-Form Summarization 126 126
Blog Post Writing 129 128

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Space Bunny Alpha vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Space Bunny Alpha vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp Cohere: Command A+ vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Cohere: Command A+ vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.