head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free)
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score69.055.6
Input Price$0.38/MFree
Output Price$1.88/MFree
Context Window1,048,576262,144
Max Output65,536235,929
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index67.555.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Qwen3.8 27B (free) costs $0 and Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) costs $0.84, so Qwen3.8 27B (free) is free for the same work.

Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Qwen3.8 27B (free).

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) offers audio input.

On our blended benchmark score Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) leads 69.0 to 55.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) scores higher on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others), Qwen3.8 27B (free) on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling).

Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) was released in September 2026 and Qwen3.8 27B (free) in August 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) if you need long documents, audio input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Qwen3.8 27B (free) if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B (free)
SQL Generation 141 137
Code Review 144 137
Code Completion 132 130
Code Refactoring 146 136
Bug Fixing 148 141
Unit Test Generation 132 127
Code Documentation 137 131
Regex Writing 126 125
CI/CD Pipelines 128 123
Frontend Component Design 130 128
Data Analysis 134 132
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 130
ETL Scripting 137 130
JSON Extraction 131 132
Bulk Data Labeling 129 130
OCR / Document Parsing 134 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 131
Long-Document Summarization 148 138
Short-Form Summarization 126 126
Blog Post Writing 129 125

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Space Bunny Alpha vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Cohere: Command A+ vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.