head-to-head

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B
Vendorgoogleqwen
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score69.055.6
Input Price$0.38/M$0.42/M
Output Price$1.88/M$3.00/M
Context Window1,048,5761,000,000
Max Output65,536131,072
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index67.555.6

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) costs $0.84 and Qwen3.8 27B costs $1.17, so Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) is about 1.4 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,048,576 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,573 and 1,500 pages.

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) offers audio input.

On our blended benchmark score Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) leads 69.0 to 55.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) scores higher on 20 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) was released in September 2026 and Qwen3.8 27B in August 2026.

Pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost, audio input, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskGoogle: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)Qwen: Qwen3.8 27B
SQL Generation 141 140
Code Review 144 142
Code Completion 132 132
Code Refactoring 146 144
Bug Fixing 148 146
Unit Test Generation 132 130
Code Documentation 137 136
Regex Writing 126 124
CI/CD Pipelines 128 126
Frontend Component Design 130 128
Data Analysis 134 132
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 135
ETL Scripting 137 135
JSON Extraction 131 131
Bulk Data Labeling 129 129
OCR / Document Parsing 134 133
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 133
Long-Document Summarization 148 146
Short-Form Summarization 126 126
Blog Post Writing 129 128

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Space Bunny Alpha vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Cohere: Command A+ vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.