head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
Vendorinclusionaimeta
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score38.6-
Input Price$0.02/M$0.10/M
Output Price$0.06/M$0.20/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output32,768943,718
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index40.5-

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.036 and Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.15, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 4.1 times cheaper for the same work.

Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Bug Fixing and others), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor on 7 (Code Completion, Code Refactoring, Code Documentation and others).

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost; pick Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor if you need long documents.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLMeta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor
SQL Generation 136 134
Code Review 134 132
Code Completion 130 131
Code Refactoring 134 136
Bug Fixing 138 136
Unit Test Generation 126 124
Code Documentation 130 131
Regex Writing 124 119
CI/CD Pipelines 122 120
Frontend Component Design 126 122
Data Analysis 130 124
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 130 134
ETL Scripting 128 128
JSON Extraction 132 131
Bulk Data Labeling 130 129
OCR / Document Parsing 130 131
Table Extraction from PDFs 130 131
Long-Document Summarization 136 138
Short-Form Summarization 126 123
Blog Post Writing 124 122

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.