head-to-head

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)
Vendorinclusionaiz-ai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score38.670.6
Input Price$0.02/M$0.06/M
Output Price$0.06/M$0.20/M
Context Window262,1441,048,576
Max Output32,768131,072
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio--
Benchmark Scores
ai_index40.569.0

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.036 and GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) costs $0.11, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 3.0 times cheaper for the same work.

GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) reads up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

On our blended benchmark score GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) leads 70.6 to 38.6.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on 2 (JSON Extraction, Bulk Data Labeling), GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) on 18 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).

Ling 3.0 Flash VL was released in September 2026 and GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) in August 2026.

Pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost; pick GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) if you need long documents, benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLZ.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 136 142
Code Review 134 145
Code Completion 130 133
Code Refactoring 134 147
Bug Fixing 138 149
Unit Test Generation 126 132
Code Documentation 130 138
Regex Writing 124 126
CI/CD Pipelines 122 128
Frontend Component Design 126 130
Data Analysis 130 134
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 130 136
ETL Scripting 128 137
JSON Extraction 132 131
Bulk Data Labeling 130 129
OCR / Document Parsing 130 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 130 134
Long-Document Summarization 136 149
Short-Form Summarization 126 127
Blog Post Writing 124 130

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Space Bunny Alpha vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Cohere: Command A+ vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.