Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.
| Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | meta | ~z-ai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.10/M | $0.03/M |
| Output Price | $0.20/M | $0.50/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 943,718 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor costs $0.15 and GLM Flash Latest costs $0.16, so Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor is slightly cheaper for the same work.
Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.
Across the 5 tasks where they differ, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor scores higher on 5 (SQL Generation, CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup, Bulk Data Labeling and others).
Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor was released in September 2026 and GLM Flash Latest in August 2026.
Pick Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 134 | 133 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 134 | 133 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 129 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 138 | 137 |
| Blog Post Writing | 122 | 121 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →