head-to-head
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-27.
| OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) | DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | openai | ~deepseek |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.05/M | $0.04/M |
| Output Price | $0.25/M | $0.29/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 384,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, DeepSeek Flash Latest costs $0.11 and GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch) costs $0.11, so DeepSeek Flash Latest is slightly cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,050,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,575 and 1,573 pages.
Pick DeepSeek Flash Latest if you need lower cost.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Related comparisons
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
Space Bunny Alpha vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)
Space Bunny Alpha vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
Cohere: Command A+ vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)
Cohere: Command A+ vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro (batch)
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek Flash Latest