head-to-head
OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.
| OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest | Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ~openai | qwen |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.10/M | $0.15/M |
| Output Price | $0.50/M | $0.47/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Max Output | 128,000 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GPT Luna Latest costs $0.23 and Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.27, so GPT Luna Latest is slightly cheaper for the same work.
Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,050,000 and 1,000,000 tokens, about 1,575 and 1,500 pages.
Only Qwen3.8 Flash offers video input.
GPT Luna Latest was released in September 2026 and Qwen3.8 Flash in August 2026.
Pick GPT Luna Latest if you need lower cost; pick Qwen3.8 Flash if you need video input.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Related comparisons
OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest
OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash
OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest
OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT Luna Latest
Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Flash