head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)
Vendorqwengoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score77.369.0
Input Price$2.00/M$0.38/M
Output Price$6.00/M$1.88/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output131,07265,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index74.967.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) costs $0.84 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $3.50, so Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) is about 4.1 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) offers audio input.

On our blended benchmark score Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads 77.3 to 69.0.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) on 7 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, Regex Writing and others).

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if you need benchmark performance; pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost or audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)
SQL Generation 142 141
Code Review 146 144
Code Completion 119 132
Code Refactoring 148 146
Bug Fixing 150 148
Unit Test Generation 133 132
Code Documentation 137 137
Regex Writing 125 126
CI/CD Pipelines 129 128
Frontend Component Design 131 130
Data Analysis 135 134
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 136 136
ETL Scripting 138 137
JSON Extraction 122 131
Bulk Data Labeling 119 129
OCR / Document Parsing 134 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 134
Long-Document Summarization 149 148
Short-Form Summarization 118 126
Blog Post Writing 130 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash (batch)

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.