head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash
Vendorqwengoogle
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score77.369.0
Input Price$2.00/M$0.75/M
Output Price$6.00/M$3.75/M
Context Window1,000,0001,048,576
Max Output131,07265,536
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio-✓
Benchmark Scores
ai_index74.967.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $1.69 and Qwen3.8 Max (0902) costs $3.50, so Gemini 3.8 Flash is about 2.1 times cheaper for the same work.

Both take in a similar amount of text: 1,000,000 and 1,048,576 tokens, about 1,500 and 1,573 pages.

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash offers audio input.

On our blended benchmark score Qwen3.8 Max (0902) leads 77.3 to 69.0.

Across the 19 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on 14 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Refactoring and others), Gemini 3.8 Flash on 5 (Code Completion, Code Documentation, JSON Extraction and others).

Pick Qwen3.8 Max (0902) if you need benchmark performance or the stronger all-round task scores; pick Gemini 3.8 Flash if you need lower cost or audio input.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash
SQL Generation 142 141
Code Review 146 144
Code Completion 119 132
Code Refactoring 148 146
Bug Fixing 150 148
Unit Test Generation 133 132
Code Documentation 137 137
Regex Writing 125 125
CI/CD Pipelines 129 128
Frontend Component Design 131 130
Data Analysis 135 134
ETL Scripting 138 137
JSON Extraction 122 131
Bulk Data Labeling 119 128
OCR / Document Parsing 134 134
Table Extraction from PDFs 134 134
Long-Document Summarization 149 148
Short-Form Summarization 118 126
Blog Post Writing 130 129

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Google: Gemini 3.8 Flash

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.