head-to-head

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.

Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
Vendorqweninclusionai
Quality Score100100
Benchmark Score-38.6
Input Price$0.15/M$0.02/M
Output Price$0.47/M$0.06/M
Context Window1,000,000262,144
Max Output131,07232,768
Tool Calling✓✓
Structured Output✓✓
Reasoning Mode✓✓
Vision✓✓
Audio✓-
Benchmark Scores
ai_index-40.5

The verdict

For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.036 and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash costs $0.27, so Ling 3.0 Flash VL is about 7.3 times cheaper for the same work.

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash reads up to 1,000,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,500 pages of text, against about 393 pages for Ling 3.0 Flash VL.

Only Qwen3.8 Omni Flash offers audio input.

Across the 20 tasks where they differ, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash scores higher on 7 (Code Completion, Code Refactoring, Code Documentation and others), Ling 3.0 Flash VL on 13 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Bug Fixing and others).

Pick Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if you need long documents or audio input; pick Ling 3.0 Flash VL if you need lower cost.

Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.

Who wins by task?

TaskQwen: Qwen3.8 Omni FlashinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL
SQL Generation 133 136
Code Review 132 134
Code Completion 131 130
Code Refactoring 136 134
Bug Fixing 136 138
Unit Test Generation 124 126
Code Documentation 131 130
Regex Writing 119 124
CI/CD Pipelines 120 122
Frontend Component Design 122 126
Data Analysis 124 130
CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup 133 130
ETL Scripting 128 128
JSON Extraction 131 132
Bulk Data Labeling 129 130
OCR / Document Parsing 131 130
Table Extraction from PDFs 131 130
Long-Document Summarization 137 136
Short-Form Summarization 123 126
Blog Post Writing 121 124

Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →

Related comparisons

OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol Pro vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 Omni Flash Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL

The Model Movers Report

One email every Friday, built from this site's own rankings: the current top five by benchmark score, every model released in the last seven days, and one note worked out from that week's numbers. You can unsubscribe from any issue with one click.