head-to-head
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-06-23.
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 | Google: Gemma 4 31B | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | xiaomi | |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 56.4 |
| Input Price | $0.14/M | $0.12/M |
| Output Price | $0.28/M | $0.35/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 262,144 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 262,144 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 48.4 |
| ai_index_agentic | - | 23.8 |
| ai_index_coding | - | 71.7 |
| eqbench | - | 70.8 |
Who wins by task?
| Task | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 | Google: Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 134 | 157 |
| Code Review | 132 | 154 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 132 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 152 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 161 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 143 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 138 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 131 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 136 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 138 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 152 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 134 | 146 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 144 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 143 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 133 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 140 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 140 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 138 | 150 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 129 |
| Blog Post Writing | 122 | 134 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →
Related comparisons
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
MiniMax: MiniMax M3 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash vs Google: Gemma 4 31B