head-to-head
Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-09-27.
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | xiaomi | meta |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Input Price | $0.14/M | $0.10/M |
| Output Price | $0.28/M | $0.20/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 943,718 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor costs $0.15 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.21, so Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is about 1.4 times cheaper for the same work.
Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released in September 2026 and Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor in August 2026.
Pick Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor if you need lower cost.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Related comparisons
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Qwen: Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Space Bunny Alpha vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Space Bunny Alpha vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
Cohere: Command A+ vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Cohere: Command A+ vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash
OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna Pro vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor