Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.
| Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro | SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | xiaomi | x-ai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | 79.0 | 79.2 |
| Input Price | $0.43/M | $2.00/M |
| Output Price | $0.87/M | $6.00/M |
| Context Window | 1,050,000 | 500,000 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 450,000 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | ✓ | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | 76.4 | 76.6 |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro costs $0.65 and Grok 4.7 costs $3.50, so MiMo-V2.6-Pro is about 5.4 times cheaper for the same work.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro reads up to 1,050,000 tokens at once, roughly 1,575 pages of text, against about 750 pages for Grok 4.7.
Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro offers audio input and video input.
Across the 13 tasks where they differ, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on 10 (SQL Generation, Code Completion, Code Documentation and others), Grok 4.7 on 3 (Code Review, Code Refactoring, Bug Fixing).
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro if you need lower cost, long documents, audio input, video input or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Pro | SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 143 | 142 |
| Code Review | 146 | 146 |
| Code Completion | 133 | 119 |
| Code Refactoring | 148 | 148 |
| Bug Fixing | 150 | 150 |
| Code Documentation | 138 | 137 |
| Regex Writing | 127 | 126 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 136 | 136 |
| JSON Extraction | 131 | 122 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 119 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 150 | 149 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 127 | 118 |
| Blog Post Writing | 131 | 130 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →