Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)
Side-by-side comparison of specs, pricing, benchmark scores, and task rankings. Updated 2026-10-04.
| Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest | Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ~z-ai | z-ai |
| Quality Score | 100 | 100 |
| Benchmark Score | - | 70.6 |
| Input Price | $0.03/M | $0.06/M |
| Output Price | $0.50/M | $0.20/M |
| Context Window | 1,048,576 | 1,048,576 |
| Max Output | 131,072 | 131,072 |
| Tool Calling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Structured Output | ✓ | ✓ |
| Reasoning Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
| Vision | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audio | - | - |
| Benchmark Scores | ||
| ai_index | - | 69.0 |
The verdict
For a sample job of 1 million input tokens and 250,000 output tokens, GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) costs $0.11 and GLM Flash Latest costs $0.16, so GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) is about 1.4 times cheaper for the same work.
Both read up to 1,048,576 tokens at once, roughly 1,573 pages of text.
Across the 19 tasks where they differ, GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) on 19 (SQL Generation, Code Review, Code Completion and others).
Pick GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) if you need lower cost or the stronger all-round task scores.
Costs use current list prices per million tokens; page counts assume about 0.75 words per token and 500 words per page.
Who wins by task?
| Task | Z.ai: GLM Flash Latest | Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| SQL Generation | 133 | 142 |
| Code Review | 132 | 145 |
| Code Completion | 131 | 133 |
| Code Refactoring | 136 | 147 |
| Bug Fixing | 136 | 149 |
| Unit Test Generation | 124 | 132 |
| Code Documentation | 131 | 138 |
| Regex Writing | 119 | 126 |
| CI/CD Pipelines | 120 | 128 |
| Frontend Component Design | 122 | 130 |
| Data Analysis | 124 | 134 |
| CSV / Spreadsheet Cleanup | 133 | 136 |
| ETL Scripting | 128 | 137 |
| Bulk Data Labeling | 129 | 129 |
| OCR / Document Parsing | 131 | 134 |
| Table Extraction from PDFs | 131 | 134 |
| Long-Document Summarization | 137 | 149 |
| Short-Form Summarization | 123 | 127 |
| Blog Post Writing | 121 | 130 |
Scores reflect capability match + benchmark data + pricing for each task. Methodology →