Business · best for

Top picks for Resume Writing (2026)

Polished, role-targeted CVs. Ranked from 334 live models on the OpenRouter catalog, weighted for reasoning quality, low cost.

What this is Ranked by capability match + real benchmark scores (Aider Polyglot, Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index) + live pricing. Models need the right specs for Resume Writing, then benchmark performance refines the order. Full methodology →
#ModelScoreIn / 1MOut / 1MContext
1 Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 120 $3.00 $15.00 1,000,000 Details →
2 OpenAI: GPT-5.4openai/gpt-5.4 118 $2.50 $15.00 1,050,000 Details →
3 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Prodeepseek/deepseek-v4-pro 118 $0.43 $0.87 1,048,576 Details →
4 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 118 $0.66 $3.50 262,144 Details →
5 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash 118 $0.09 $0.18 1,048,576 Details →
6 MiniMax: MiniMax M3minimax/minimax-m3 117 $0.30 $1.20 1,048,576 Details →
7 Google: Gemini 3.1 Pro Previewgoogle/gemini-3.1-pro-preview 117 $2.00 $12.00 1,048,576 Details →
8 Google: Gemini 3.5 Flashgoogle/gemini-3.5-flash 116 $1.50 $9.00 1,048,576 Details →
9 Z.ai: GLM 5.2z-ai/glm-5.2 116 $1.00 $4.00 1,048,576 Details →
10 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.7 Codemoonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code 116 $0.61 $3.07 262,144 Details →
11 Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17Bqwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b 116 $0.39 $2.45 256,000 Details →
12 OpenAI: o3openai/o3 116 $2.00 $8.00 200,000 Details →
13 Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plusqwen/qwen3.6-plus 116 $0.33 $1.95 1,000,000 Details →
14 OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nanoopenai/gpt-5.4-nano 116 $0.20 $1.25 400,000 Details →
15 OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Miniopenai/gpt-5.4-mini 116 $0.75 $4.50 400,000 Details →

How we ranked these

For Resume Writing, we weight models on reasoning quality, low cost. Scores combine each model's public specs with independent benchmark results (Aider Polyglot coding scores, Artificial Analysis intelligence/coding/agentic indices) and live pricing. See full methodology →

About Resume Writing

Resume writing is the task of creating or refining a CV that matches a specific role, industry, and job description. You need this when applying to competitive positions where generic CVs fail, or when you lack the language to articulate technical skills and achievements. Good models restructure bullet points for impact, mirror job description keywords without lying, and maintain professional tone across sections. Poor models produce generic templates, inflate claims, or miss role-specific requirements. The main trade-off: Claude and GPT-4 produce higher-quality output but cost more per use than faster models like GPT-3.5, though the difference is typically under $0.10 per resume.

When to use: Use this when you're applying to a specific job and need to tailor your CV to match the role, or when you want to rewrite weak bullet points into achievement-focused statements that will pass both human and ATS (applicant tracking system) screening.

Common questions

Which AI model produces the most ATS-friendly resume formatting?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4 both handle ATS compliance well, but Claude excels at maintaining clean structure and keyword integration without overselling. GPT-4 is faster if you're batch-processing multiple resume versions. Test both with your target job description to see which keyword placement strategy works best for your industry.

How much does it cost to have an AI rewrite an entire resume?

Most rewrites cost $0.05 to $0.15 using GPT-4 or Claude, depending on resume length and revision depth. For unlimited rewrites and multiple role versions, a ChatGPT Plus subscription ($20/month) offers better value than per-use API costs.

Related tasks